Spending was up on a monthly basis in 8 of 16 nonresidential subcategories. Both public and private nonresidential spending were up 0.1% in June. Private nonresidential construction spending was down nearly 5% from a year ago.

“Through April 2025, private nonresidential construction spending ascended to $806.1 billion on a seasonally adjusted annual rate basis, an all-time high,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu. “Since then, that figure has expanded only three times over the past 14 months.

“Despite an ongoing data center construction boom, private nonresidential construction spending has declined to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of $745.3 billion since the April 2025 peak, which translates into a decline exceeding 7%,” said Basu. “Tellingly, private nonresidential construction spending excluding data centers fell 0.6% in June 2026 and is down 7.9% year over year.

“Meanwhile, data center construction was up 7% in June and up 46% from a year ago. Contractors working on data centers continue to benefit from this momentum. According to ABC’s latest Construction Backlog Indicator, the 13% of ABC members under contract to work on data centers have significantly higher backlog (11.0 months) than the 87% that are not (8.5 months).”

Visit abc.org/economics for the Construction Backlog Indicator and Construction Confidence Index, plus analysis of spending, employment, job openings and the Producer Price Index.

Associated Builders and Contractors is a national construction industry trade association established in 1950 with 67 chapters and 24,000 members. Founded on the merit shop philosophy, ABC helps members offer a robust employee value proposition, develop people, win work and deliver that work safely, ethically and profitably for the betterment of the communities in which ABC and its members work. Visit us at abc.org. 

The post June Nonresidential Construction Spending Up on Strength of Data Centers first appeared on Construction Executive.

“Interpreting these data is often challenging,” said ABC Chief Economist Anirban Basu. “One could take these figures at face value and conclude that construction is thriving and driving demand for workers higher. Indeed, ABC’s Construction Confidence Indicator shows that the average contractor expects rising revenues and employment over the next six months.

“But June’s construction spending report indicates that overall residential and nonresidential construction spending continues to decline,” said Basu. “Accordingly, one might look for other explanations for rising construction job openings, including demographic considerations.

“Many contractors view a structural shortfall of skilled labor as their primary challenge because many highly experienced, productive workers are retiring,” said Basu. “It is conceivable that these workers are being replaced with less skilled and productive workers, thereby requiring a few workers to be replaced by many.

“Alternatively, the data may not be capturing all that transpires,” said Basu. “It may be that certain people who had been working in construction were doing so without proper documentation. At least some of these workers are no longer available at jobsites, inducing faster hiring and expanding job openings as contractors work to replace them.”

SEE ALSO: OUT OF OFFICE: WHEN INTERNAL WORKFORCE RELOCATION IS APPROPRIATE FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

The post Construction Job Openings Increase By 14,000 in June, Up 36% Year Over Year first appeared on Construction Executive.

The post Construction Attorneys: Contract Negotiation Strategy first appeared on Construction Executive.

Texas-based Central Builders was established in 1989 and specializes in large-scale remodels, expansions and ground-up new construction of supermarkets and grocery distribution facilities. As the company expanded, on-time project delivery and profitability were increasingly threatened by disconnected workflows and data silos that delayed job-cost updates, required duplicate data entry and limited insight into project performance.

The company invested in a connected construction ecosystem that aligns project management, financial operations and reporting to ensure that all teams work from a single source of truth across projects. Time and again, this decision has proven to be critical to project success.

The Challenge: Building on a 30,000-Square-Foot Pond

Central Builders has completed well over $500 million in grocery store projects over the past five years. One was a new $10-million Sprouts grocery store built in 2025 in an unlikely place: directly on top of a 30,000-square-foot pond. The challenging location was only the beginning of the complexities that tested the company’s capabilities and illustrated the value of the investment in connected technology. Persistent rain, the coordination of more than 40 subcontractors and a simultaneous Sprouts project in North Texas left zero margin for error.

Before vertical construction could begin, crews had to demuck the site, excavate unstable material and rebuild the pad with engineered fill. Central Builders completed the site preparation 10 days ahead of schedule, an advantage that proved vital when the weather turned.

Moisture affected nearly every downstream activity. Dry weather windows opened and closed quickly, and sequencing often shifted by the hour. Coordinating crews, materials and inspections under these conditions required clear communication and real-time visibility into job progress and costs.

Despite environmental and logistical challenges, the Sprouts project reached key milestones ahead of schedule. Steel erection and decking were finished five days ahead of plan, and the project closed on time and on budget.

Connecting the Field and the Office

Central Builders relies on a cohesive technology ecosystem built largely around Trimble solutions to bring people, data and workflows together in a shared environment.

Field teams utilize Trimble ProjectSight to manage RFIs, submittals and drawing updates. “With ProjectSight, everyone has real-time access to the most current information,” says Shellie Gregg, financial controller for Central Builders. “Shared visibility reduces rework and keeps our teams aligned as schedules shift and as documents are updated or added.”

In the office, the Trimble Vista financial management solution serves as the system of record for accounting, payroll, job costing and subcontractor billing. With field updates flowing directly into financial reporting, manual data entry has decreased by 90%. “Job-cost data reflects exactly what is happening on the jobsite,” says Gregg. “Plus, visibility into field updates enables our teams to closely track performance and respond quickly when conditions change.”

Gregg credits improved job-costing visibility with increasing field-budget forecasting accuracy by more than 30%, helping project managers hit margin targets.

Driving Efficiency and Cash Flow

The investment in connected construction didn’t take long to pay off. “Within eight months, we realized a return on investment,” says Gregg. “Payroll savings, reduced administrative overhead and better, faster operational decision-making enabled by real-time data collectively transformed our business.” 

The impact of a connected construction approach is visible across Central Builders’ operations:

• More Timely Job Costing: Integrated project and financial management systems bridged the field-to-office divide, allowing managers to align job cost with actuals in near real time.
• Faster Financial Reporting Cycles: Live dashboards connected to project financial data shortened monthly close cycles from 12 days to five.
• Labor Transparency: With real-time visibility into labor through phase-level time tracking and automated burden calculations, teams can assess performance weekly and adjust forecasts before a project drifts off course.
• Streamlined Vendor Management: Automating compliance and shortening approval cycles with Trimble Pay has reduced subcontractor payment processing time from two weeks to less than five days, keeping vendors engaged and materials flowing to the site.

Predictability in an Unpredictable Environment

Technology adoption has not only improved workflows at Central Builders but also changed how people work across the company and how they feel about their jobs.

“In a fast-paced construction environment where job costing, documentation and approvals can grind morale into dust, connected technology has become the backbone of clarity, speed and sanity,” Gregg concludes.

Project managers now spend fewer hours reconciling numbers and more time directing work. Predictability has reduced burnout and improved morale. Late nights reconciling numbers or “guessing” when trades should be on site have decreased dramatically, and office staff report a 35% decrease in rework caused by outdated or missing documentation.

These outcomes at Central Builders demonstrate the power of connected construction workflows for responding quickly, sharing data across the organization and making decisions based on reliable information rather than assumptions.

SEE ALSO: POWERING PROFITABILITY WITH CONNECTED CONSTRUCTION WORKFLOWS

The post Building on Water:  How Central Builders Leveraged Connected Construction to Conquer a Complex Jobsite first appeared on Construction Executive.

In 2025, Buildcheck officially launched after raising $5.9 million in seed funding—with help from Uncork Capital, Peterson Ventures, XFund, and founders and senior executives at OpenAI, Opendoor, CBRE, Zillow and more.

Michalatos sat down with Construction Executive to discuss the rigorous creative and prototyping process for this product, how he expects the technology to evolve over the next decade, as well as many details in between.

What type of technology is Buildcheck?

Buildcheck is an AI-powered design review platform. We’ve trained computer vision models to read construction drawings—the language of construction—so we can catch coordination errors, missing scope and cross-discipline conflicts before they turn into RFIs, change orders or city comments. We work with real estate developers, general contractors and design firms, and our customers typically see a 10x to 40x return on what they spend with us.

What was the impetus for creating Buildcheck?

The impetus is personal. I grew up in a construction family in Vancouver—my father built single-family homes for decades—and I spent my own career on the owner, general contractor and design sides: Stantec, Honeywell, EllisDon on hospital design-builds and QuadReal on mixed-use development. Across every one of those roles, I kept seeing the same pattern: small inconsistencies scattered across hundreds of sheets that nobody caught until steel was going up or concrete was being poured. Globally, that’s a $200-billion problem. When I stepped back, it was obvious: Construction doesn’t run on contracts or emails, it runs on drawings. Until AI could actually read the lines on a sheet, it was going to stay peripheral to real construction risk. That’s what Buildcheck is built to solve.

Who is Buildcheck’s main type of client within construction?

Primarily general contractors and real estate developers, with a growing number of architecture and engineering firms using us as an internal QA/QC layer. Our customers include EllisDon, AvalonBay, Novo Construction, Dempsey Construction and many more.

The common thread is that they’re all managing design risk—not just building. That’s a bigger group than it used to be. Public infrastructure is increasingly delivered through design-build and alliance contracts, which push design responsibility onto contractors. Mid-market developers are engaging general contractors earlier through preconstruction services or GMP structures. Architects are carrying more professional liability exposure on bigger, more complex drawing sets. All of them share the same underlying need: find the coordination gaps before they get priced into a change order.

We tend to fit best with firms that have already decided design coordination is a bottleneck. They usually know exactly where it hurts; our job is to show them that AI can now do something about it.

Do you work with clients outside of construction?

No, and that’s intentional. Computer vision on construction drawings is a uniquely hard problem—drawings aren’t standardized, symbol sets vary by firm and discipline, and layering conventions shift project to project. Training a model that genuinely understands an MEP sheet versus a structural sheet or civil sheet takes years of labeled data and domain expertise. That depth is the moat, and it only comes from staying focused.

That said, the underlying technology could apply to other drawing-heavy industries—shipbuilding, aerospace manufacturing and certain industrial engineering verticals. For now, the opportunity in construction alone is enormous. The global design-error problem is $200 billion annually and nobody has solved it. We’d rather be the best in the world at one thing than average at several.

Do you still run into problems with designers/companies hesitant to use AI for preconstruction? How do you create buy-in/convince them to get onboard in the first place?

Yes, and I think that skepticism is healthy. There’s a lot of AI-washing in construction tech right now and buyers are right to demand proof.

For our clients, a demo is the starting point, but the real conversation begins when we run their drawings through Buildcheck. In most cases, we come back with dozens to hundreds of flagged issues that their experienced team hadn’t caught. If that first project lands, a companywide rollout tends to follow naturally. We also invite any prospective customers to talk to current customers and hear directly from them, not us.

The other piece is framing. We aren’t replacing labor; we’re enabling your people to do more. Your senior reviewers still make the judgment calls. We just compress the hours of repetitive pattern-matching work—the missing power, the mismatched fire ratings, the clashing service connections—so your people can spend their time on the decisions that actually require expertise. When buyers understand that, the skepticism usually shifts from “will this work?” to “how fast can we roll it out?”

Does this type of tech only apply to the preconstruction process?

Preconstruction is where we start because that’s where the ROI is most obvious. Catching a coordination issue on a sheet costs almost nothing to fix; catching it in the field can cost six figures and weeks of schedule. Front-end planning research from the Construction Industry Institute has consistently shown returns of roughly 10:1 on investment in document quality before construction.

But computer vision on drawings unlocks workflows across the entire project lifecycle, such as shop drawing cross-checks against the IFC set, change-order quantification, automated takeoffs and, eventually, as-built verification. The same underlying models that detect errors today can drive proactive design improvement tomorrow—through real-time coordination feedback as drawings and design optimization evolve.

The long-term vision is that drawings stop being static PDFs and start being structured, machine-readable artifacts. Once that happens, everything downstream—estimating, procurement, coordination, closeout—gets meaningfully faster.

What was the development/prototyping process like for getting this product out the door?

Our process was and continues to be rigorous and disciplined. We’ve spent over three years building proprietary models trained specifically for construction drawings, but also building the user experience around it. Neither of these can be vibecoded because the domain expertise and customer feedback loops take time to establish.

Two things shaped the process. First, we chose quality at every step—from labeling the data and fine-tuning the models to having construction experts verify every AI output before it reaches the customer. Second, our earliest customers did more to shape the user experience than any internal plan ever could have. General contractors and developers willing to give us feedback are how we figured out what reviewers actually want to see first, how to surface severity and how the interface should mirror the way their teams already work.

How has this type of technology evolved since Buildcheck’s inception? Where do you see it going by the next decade?

When we started, most construction AI was optical character recognition, chatbots layered over contract text or basic clash detection inside a BIM model. Useful, but peripheral to the core risk. The shift over the last two years has been toward specialized vision models that can actually interpret 2D drawings—the medium construction still overwhelmingly runs on.

Looking out ten years, I’d expect three things. First, error detection becomes table stakes—every major project will run through automated review the same way it runs through code check today. Second, the tooling moves from reactive to proactive: Rather than flagging problems after a set is issued, AI will provide real-time coordination feedback inside the design-authoring tools as drawings evolve. Third, we’ll start to see genuine design optimization—AI that suggests smaller duct runs, more efficient structural layouts and value engineering moves grounded in both code and constructability.

Is there fear that this type of AI will ‘take people’s jobs’?

It comes up and it deserves an answer. AI isn’t going to replace most construction jobs—it won’t sequence concrete pours, negotiate a subcontract or lead a toolbox talk. Leadership and judgment in construction remain deeply human. And besides, there is a huge backlog of work for the entire industry. We want to do more and technology enables that; we can’t afford to lose people.

What AI removes is the repetitive, pattern-based review work that consumes hours: hunting missing dimensions across 400 sheets, cross-referencing fire ratings, chasing broken callouts. Given the industry’s labor gap and flat productivity, the real risk isn’t AI taking jobs. It’s the industry being unable to deliver enough projects, affordably, because we can’t scale human expertise fast enough. AI is a leverage tool for the people already here.

How has this tech saved money, time, safety, productivity?

Money and time are the easiest to quantify. Design errors and coordination gaps drive an estimated $200 billion in global overages annually. On individual projects, we regularly see six-figure savings and multi-week schedule protection—on one 230-unit multifamily project, over $500,000 in cost avoidance and 27 days of schedule saved. Under conservative assumptions, customers see 10-40x ROI.

Safety is the most underappreciated. The highest-severity inconsistencies we catch are life-safety issues—mismatched fire ratings between disciplines, undersized electrical feeds to fire pumps and missing sprinkler branches. Finding those in the documents, before installation, is meaningfully better than catching them at commissioning.

Do you believe this type of technology is gaining momentum within the industry? Is it helping give AI a friendlier reputation within construction?

Yes, clearly. Recent industry surveys show up to 64% of construction organizations experimenting with AI. Two years ago, the first meeting was about, “Does this work on drawings at all?”

Today it’s about which vendor, what pilot structure, what rollout. That’s a meaningful shift.Construction is actually one of the better industries for AI to land in, because it’s pragmatic. Professionals don’t care about hype—they care about dollars saved, days saved and risk reduced. When they see AI flag a real issue on a real drawing set, skepticism fades quickly. The caveat: Overpromising vendors can set the category back. The industry has a long memory for broken tech promises.

Anything else?

Don’t conflate AI with LLMs. A lot of construction buyers assume ChatGPT-style tools are what AI looks like. Those models are excellent at text—contracts, specs, RFIs—but construction’s highest-value problems are visual: drawings, models, site conditions. The vendors solving those problems are doing specialized computer vision work that looks very different from a chatbot wrapper. When you’re evaluating AI tools, the first question to ask is what the models were actually trained on.

SEE ALSO: SIX AI SOLUTIONS DRIVING PRODUCTIVITY AND PROFITABILITY IN CONSTRUCTION OFFICES

The post A New Vision for AI: Construction Design-Review Platform Lends Extra Eye to Image Analysis first appeared on Construction Executive.

Why are companies relying more on internal relocation instead of local hiring alone?

Companies are increasingly relying on internal relocation because business demands are moving faster than local hiring pipelines. In fast-growing markets, relocating existing employees allows organizations to quickly place experienced talent where it is needed most. Internal employees also bring valuable institutional knowledge, already understanding company culture, systems and safety standards, which reduces training time. Internal mobility is not replacing local hiring—it is complementing it. Many organizations are using a balanced approach, combining relocated internal talent with local recruitment to meet immediate needs while building long-term workforce strength in key markets.

How do you decide when to relocate someone for a specific project?

The decision to relocate someone for a specific project is typically driven by a combination of market demand, project complexity and timing. When project activity in a region begins to outpace the availability of local talent, organizations may turn to internal mobility to quickly fill critical roles and maintain momentum.

How has internal workforce mobility changed over the past few years?

Over the past few years, internal workforce mobility has become more intentional and proactive rather than a reactive solution to address a gap in support. As industries and markets evolve quickly, organizations are increasingly relying on internal moves to support fast-growing markets with specialized projects. Nashville is a great example of this. In addition to solving a need, employees are more open to relocation when the right opportunity aligns with their career goals. Advancements in remote collaboration tools and shared systems have also made transitions smoother and more seamless than in the past, enabling employees to integrate into new teams and roles with greater ease.

What types of markets are most likely to require talent migration?

The markets most likely to require talent migration are high-growth, high-demand markets where multiple large-scale projects are ramping up and local labor supply cannot keep pace. This is especially common in areas experiencing population growth, infrastructure expansion or significant private investment that increases demand for skilled workers in a short period of time. Importantly, this is not a challenge unique to any one city or region, it reflects a broader national pattern as fast-growing markets across the country compete for skilled talent to support economic and infrastructure development.

How does mobility help maintain quality and consistency across regions?

Internal mobility plays a critical role in maintaining quality and consistency across regions by helping organizations spread best practices and proven processes between offices and project teams. When experienced employees and leaders relocate to new or growing markets, they reinforce consistent safety cultures, quality standards and delivery approaches that align with the company’s core values and expectations. For companies like Skanska, internal talent movement helps establish the “Skanska way” on projects, ensuring a shared commitment to execution, collaboration and operational excellence.

How important is it for team members to work with other office locations frequently?

Regular cross-office engagement helps employees develop relationships, understand regional differences and align around shared processes and expectations, making transitions between locations much smoother when relocation opportunities arise. Compared to the past, advances in remote collaboration tools, shared systems and consistent workflows have made it easier for teams to work seamlessly across regions long before an employee physically relocates. As a result, workforce mobility is often more effective today because employees are already connected to colleagues, projects and company culture.

Could relocating team members disrupt chemistry/workflow—or improve it?

Relocating internal team members often strengthens chemistry and workflow rather than disrupting it. Because internal employees already understand the company’s culture, systems, expectations and ways of working, they are typically able to integrate into teams more quickly than an external hire. Shared values, established communication styles and familiarity with processes help create continuity and reduce friction, particularly on fast-moving projects. In many cases, internal mobility can actually improve collaboration by bringing fresh perspectives and experience from other markets while maintaining consistency in execution.

How best to ensure camaraderie amid transition?

Relocated employees often play an important role in this process because they can speak from firsthand experience about integrating into a new team, adapting to a different market and building relationships quickly. A strong, consistent company culture also helps reinforce teamwork by ensuring employees across regions share common values, systems and ways of working.

SEE ALSO: AI HITS THE JOBSITE: THE WORKFORCE TRAINING GAP

The post Out of Office: When Internal Workforce Relocation Is Appropriate for Construction Projects first appeared on Construction Executive.

According to data published in the Beck Group’s latest construction cost report, nonresidential construction costs increased about 5% last year, which falls within the range of normal cost escalation. In 2026, construction cost inputs are expected to trend close to last year’s level, pending no major hiccups, such as a prolonged Middle East conflict.

Expectations of another year of stable construction costs, along with potentially lower interest rates and reduced inflationary pressures, helped buoy AEC firms’ hopes of improved business conditions later this year.   

The report lists input costs for markets in Atlanta, Austin, Dallas/Fort Worth, Denver, South and West Florida, and Raleigh. It presents construction costs for healthcare, higher education, hospitality, office, multifamily, faith-based, parking and site work.    

Tariff Impacts Overblown

Many AEC firms feared significantly higher prices for imported construction materials when the Trump administration unleashed an unprecedented flurry of global tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and other statutes in the first quarter of 2025. The IEEPA tariffs had their greatest impact on metal products, such as aluminum, steel and copper.

But a Supreme Court decision in February ruled that the tariffs were deemed illegal. That led the administration to impose a 15% tariff increase under a different statute to replace the invalidated tariffs.   

Surging demand for data centers and mission-critical infrastructure projects contributed to higher prices for metal products. But prices for other construction materials were largely capped by slower activity in nonresidential projects.

Significant construction cost escalation failed to materialize for various reasons. That included the administration successfully negotiating lower tariffs with some countries and no new 2025 tariffs following the initial round that year.

Other contributing factors included AEC firms implementing cost-containment strategies, such as negotiating supplier deals or purchasing materials from countries with lower tariffs. Some AEC firms’ workflow models, such as Beck’s highly collaborative design-build model, also proved valuable in stabilizing project costs.

Demand for Skilled Trades Heats Up in Cooling Labor Market  

Additionally, input costs remained affected by the ongoing shortage of construction workers. That trend is exacerbated by a proliferation of data center and other large-scale construction projects, which are siphoning skilled workers from other projects by offering higher pay and other attractive incentives.  

However, overall demand for construction labor has cooled amid fewer commercial projects, particularly in the office and multifamily segments. Higher borrowing costs have made it difficult for owners and developers to pencil in these projects profitably. But steady demand exists for healthcare and educational projects, which are typically funded with public investments.      

Costs are also impacted by building codes and regulations, building designs and other factors. Those costs generally gradually rise over time and are in addition to material and labor costs.

Firms still face headwinds that could push construction costs above anticipated levels this year. More costly tariffs and other event risks could potentially lead to supply disruptions, material scarcity and higher energy costs.

Regional Cost Disparities

In the breakdown of building costs in Beck’s markets, there are significant differences across regions and industry sectors. Size, location, project type and complexity, labor wages and material prices are among the mix of factors influencing construction costs.

South Florida had the highest input costs in Beck’s operating regions. West Florida, Denver and Atlanta were also at the high end of costs, while Raleigh, Austin and Dallas/Forth Worth were on the lower end.  

The report shows significant cost differences across several building categories in Beck’s markets.

Below are examples of building costs in Beck’s markets. The building sectors listed below reflect the lowest (generally Dallas/Foth Worth) and highest (generally South Florida) construction costs in the firm’s markets. 

• Healthcare–In Beck’s seven markets, the cost of building an acute care hospital ranges from a low of between $705 to $832 per square foot to a high between $795 and $938 per square foot. Costs for a core-and-shell medical office building (without tenant improvements) range from $225 to $265 per square foot to $292 to $345 per square foot. Many industry veterans may recall that the cost to build complex healthcare facilities, such as hospitals, ranged from $500 to $600 per square foot. Those costs are now approaching $1,000 per square foot, reflecting technical requirements and long-term escalation.

• Hospitality–Construction costs for a five-star hotel range from a low of $594,392 to $701,338 per key to a high of $990,654 to $1.168 million per key. The cost of a four-star hotel ranges from $235,945 to $278,397 per key to $499,093 to $588,892 per key.
• Higher Education–Building costs for general classroom and office buildings range from a low of $403 to $476 per square foot to a high of $621 to $733 per square foot. The projects’ renovation costs range from $355 to $418 per square foot to $433 to $511 per square foot.
• Multifamily–Input costs for a rental high-rise project range from a low of $330,956 to $390,503 per square foot to a high of $623,130 to $735,246 per square foot.
• Office–Input costs for a seven-plus-story, core-and-shell office building (without interior finishes and parking facilities) range from a low of $237 to $279 per square foot to a high of between $326 and $385 per square foot. The cost of constructing office buildings is approaching $300 per square foot nationwide, up from the historically lower end of $200 per square foot. The office market has undergone structural changes since the pandemic, with many older or underutilized buildings being used or planned for residential or mixed-use projects. There is a general lack of interest in speculative, ground-up office buildings due to higher borrowing costs and concerns over their profitability in the current environment.
• Faith-Based–Worship space construction costs range from a low of $424 to $500 per square foot to a high of $659 to $778 per square foot. Renovation costs for this building type range from $189 to $223 per square foot to $231 to $272 per square foot.
• Parking–Construction costs for a precast parking structure range from $18,672 to $41,420. For an above-grade podium parking structure, the cost to build this facility ranges from $43,179 to $84,824.
• Sitework–For work on urban sites less than five acres, costs range from $1.45 million to $2.32 million. For non-urban sites between 5-15 acres, the cost ranges from $911,808 to $1.45 million; for non-urban sites larger than 15 acres, the cost ranges from $561,674 to $896,639.

Barring any unforeseen bearish events in 2026, construction cost inputs are expected to mirror cost escalation in 2025. This year also marks a period of guarded optimism among AEC firms, following a turbulent year. Beck will publish an update on nonresidential construction costs in the markets listed above later this year, providing a snapshot of how building costs are transforming a dynamic built environment.    

SEE ALSO:

The post Construction Costs Should Stabilize for 2026 Despite Persistent Global Pressures first appeared on Construction Executive.

On June 26, 2026, JGM announced the addition of three accomplished industry leaders to its executive team. The appointments of Brian M. Jones PMP as vice president of business development; Amy DePaoli as director of marketing; and Garrick Weaver SPHR SHRM-SCP as director of talent acquisition and workforce development reflect the company’s commitment to building the infrastructure needed to become a nationally recognized force in industrial construction.

Jones joins JGM with more than 20 years of experience driving revenue expansion and market positioning across the industrial engineering, procurement and construction sectors. A strategic growth leader with a hands-on technical foundation, he brings a rare combination of full-cycle capture planning, competitive intelligence and deep client relationship management having served key markets in pulp and paper, refining, chemicals, metals and power.

DePaoli brings more than two decades of marketing leadership experience spanning logistics, food and beverage, retail and consumer brands. She has a demonstrated history of building marketing functions from the ground up, driving measurable growth, and establishing compelling brand identities for companies navigating rapid expansion.

A Senior Professional in Human Resources (SPHR) and SHRM Senior Certified Professional (SHRM-SCP), Weaver is a trusted HR leader with extensive experience building scalable hiring pipelines, designing workforce development programs and cultivating high-performance cultures across complex, multisite organizations including manufacturing, utilities and professional services.

Sebastien Roussotte Announced as New Achilles CEO

On June 30, 2026, Achilles announced the appointment of Sebastien Roussotte as chief executive officer, effective immediately. He succeeds interim CEO Craig Rodgerson, who will return to his role as chairman of the Achilles board.

S&B Receives Gold Safety Excellence Award From Industry Business Roundtable 

On July 07, 2026, S&B received a Gold Safety Excellence Award in the General Contractor Extra Large category from the Industry Business Roundtable for its work on the ExxonMobil Baytown Olefins Plant2X Expansion Project. The team was recognized at an industry event in May.  The award recognizes S&B’s commitment to maintaining the highest standards of safety performance while delivering complex projects in the Texas Gulf Coast region. Presented as part of the 2025–2026 Safety Excellence Awards program, the recognition highlights organizations that demonstrate exceptional safety leadership, continuous improvement and a strong culture of workplace safety.

Wesco Announces Alex Piwoschuk as U.S. Central Leader for Construction

On July 9, 2026, Wesco International announced that Alex Piwoschuk has joined the company as vice president of sales for U.S. Construction in the Central region. This role will be instrumental in developing the strategic direction to deliver industry-leading construction services and expertise to help manage customers’ most complex and demanding projects.

New Edge Contractors Expands Leadership Team to Support Continued Growth

On July 10, 2026, New Edge Contractors expanded its leadership team to strengthen the organizational capacity behind continued growth across its two disciplines: construction management and resource management. The transition formalizes the executive responsibilities of co-founders Mike Clay and John Wiegand. Clay has assumed the role of chief executive officer, providing enterprise leadership, long-term strategic direction and accountability for the company’s organizational growth. Wiegand has assumed the role of chief development officer, leading development strategy, client relationships, market expansion and new business opportunities.

Skanska USA Building Establishes Digital Transformation and Solutions Team to Expand the Use of AI Across the Business

On July 14, 2026, Skanska announced the formation of its digital transformation and solutions team, a move to scale AI and technology to continue enhancing project delivery. The group unites Skanska’s data solutions, emerging tech and AI capabilities to turn project knowledge into practical tools that support project teams and broader business priorities. Durham-based executive Will Senner has been appointed senior vice president, digital transformation and solutions to lead the team.

Swinerton Announces Leadership Promotions to Support Growth in Southern California Education and Healthcare Markets

On July 14, 2026, Swinerton Builders has promoted David Cramp and Brian Holley to vice president and division manager roles, strengthening the company’s leadership in two of Southern California’s most active construction sectors: education and healthcare. Cramp has been named vice president, division manager, K-14 Education–Southern California; Holley has been promoted to vice president, division manager, Healthcare–Southern California.

Branch Announces Key Executive Appointments to Strengthen Enterprise Growth

On July 14, 2026, Branch has announced key executive leadership appointments to strengthen long-term growth, business development, pursuit strategy and operational excellence. 

Brian Quinlan has been appointed executive vice president, strategic growth. In this new role, Quinlan will focus on where Branch should grow and help Branch create a roadmap the ensures our future.

Mike Colbert has been appointed executive vice president, enterprise pursuits. This role will serve as the accountable executive for all major pursuits. Colbert will oversee enterprise pursuit governance, estimating practices, pricing strategy, pipeline governance, win/loss analytics, and aligns preconstruction and operations. 

Brian Evans will take the lead of Branch Civil as executive vice president. Evans’ career in the heavy/highway construction industry spans over two decades. He has directly managed both state and federal highway projects in the Commonwealth of Virginia, with experience in both roadway and bridge construction.

Manhattan Construction Company Announces North Texas Leadership Appointments to Support Diverse, Complex Project Portfolio

On July 16, 2026, Manhattan Construction Company announced a series of leadership appointments and role confirmations in its Dallas-area regional office, strengthening the team responsible for delivering a growing portfolio of complex construction projects across North Texas. The leadership team’s new appointments include Travis Porter as Dallas regional leader, Jason Dunnam as operations manager, Anthony Wright as general superintendent and Kevin Gass as project director. 

Porter was promoted to Manhattan Construction Company’s Dallas regional leader, recognizing his proven ability to lead people, projects and operations across one of the company’s most active and complex markets. Porter has more than 15 years of experience delivering high-profile construction work in North Texas. He has steadily taken on broader leadership responsibility since joining Manhattan in 2010, starting as an intern on the George W. Bush Presidential Center project on the Southern Methodist University campus. He is a graduate of Texas A&M University with a degree in construction science.

Dunnam joined Manhattan as operations manager for the Dallas regional office. Dunnam brings more than 25 years of commercial construction experience and previously served as vice president of construction at EMJ Corporation, where he led operational strategy for large, multidisciplinary teams.

Wright was promoted to general superintendent and brings more than 25 years of experience managing field operations for large, technically complex projects. His background includes professional sports facilities, commercial developments and mixed-use projects.

Gass was promoted to project director and will provide strategic oversight and leadership for project teams across the Dallas region. Gass holds a degree in civil engineering from Virginia Tech and has more than 35 years of industry experience, representing more than $5.4 billion in completed construction work.

Sims Crane & Equipment Names Mike Kuffermann as Chief Operating Officer

On July 21, 2026, Sims Crane announced the appointment of Florida native Mike Kuffermann as chief operating officer. Kuffermann brings more than 17 years of experience with Sims Crane and represents a second-generation family legacy within the organization. He began his career as an apprentice and has advanced through service operations, dispatch, outside sales and executive leadership, most recently serving as chief sales officer. The appointment reflects both his proven track record of performance and the company’s continued focus on operational excellence.

ABC Supply Interiors Opens Location in Tupelo, Mississippi

On July 22, 2026, ABC Supply Interiors, formerly L&W Supply Corporation, opened a new location at 3406 West Main Street in Tupelo, marking its second location in Mississippi. The location is managed by Andy Witt, who was promoted to branch manager in March 2026. Witt brings more than 21 years of industry experience, including 10 years with ABC Supply Interiors.

Skanska U.S. Building Operations Selects Brian Urban as Executive Vice President-General Manager for California

On July 27, 2026, Skanska announced the appointment of Brian Urban as executive vice president and general manager for its Skanska USA Building operations in California, effective immediately. In this role, Urban will oversee project operations in the state, with a focus on strengthening customer and partner relationships, growing the business and continuing to build Skanska’s reputation across the region. Urban joins a well-established local leadership team with deep roots in the San Francisco Bay Area market. The team’s relationships with clients, partners, subcontractors and community stakeholders, built over many years, remain fully in place. Urban will work closely with local leadership to continue the office’s momentum and build on the trust Skanska has established across the region.

SEE ALSO: NEW NAMES AND FACES: JUNE 2026

The post New Names and Faces: July 2026        first appeared on Construction Executive.

The rapid buildout of data centers has triggered a hiring boom in the construction industry. Spending on data center facilities could reach as much as $7 trillion by 2030, with thousands of data centers currently underway and thousands more to be announced. The increased demand for construction jobs has created a strong pipeline for Gen Z entering the workforce.

With that said, Gen Z does not have hands-on experience like previous generations, and the industry is faced with the challenge of training a new generation in the complex tactical skills of estimating. Historically, knowledge transfer between veterans and newer estimators happened through years of proximity, learning to read drawing sets and price assemblies through repetition and correction. Now, leveraging technology and industry resources is the only way to equip newcomers with the skills needed to support the projected scale of AI infrastructure.

Less than a year ago, the rate of open construction jobs dropped to its lowest point in nearly a decade, thus renewed interest in construction jobs comes at a crucial time for the industry. The future of construction will depend on how effectively decades of institutional knowledge can be transferred from experienced professionals nearing retirement to the newcomers poised to replace them.

A Two-Sided Adoption Challenge

What makes the experience gap difficult to close is that it cuts in two directions, and most discussions of AI in construction address only one of them.

Many veteran estimators have built deep, trade-specific expertise inside legacy estimating platforms. For this group, adopting new AI-enabled tools is less of a skill issue and more so a technology latency issue. In their eyes, the methods they have used for years still work for them, so they are not motivated to learn new platforms. This is a key vulnerability of the profession, because if that group does not adopt new tools, their expertise stays hidden in workflows nobody else can see.

Newer estimators present the opposite risk. Handing an estimator an AI tool early in their career that can answer nearly any question raises the risk that they will rely on it instead of developing their own judgment. Getting answers isn’t the same as closing the experience gap. An estimator needs to learn how to find the right answers independently. The gap has simply been outsourced, which leads to problems when AI inevitably gets something wrong and no one on the team is positioned to catch it.

The industry’s approach to AI in estimating needs to account for both sides of that equation rather than focusing only on newer hires. Construction technology companies need tools that are trained by professionals who already know the trade, capture what is valuable about how they think and then transfer that knowledge to newer estimators in a way that builds skill rather than dependence.

Designing for Adoption and Depth 

Estimating software must satisfy two goals that are somewhat contradictory. It needs to be fast and accurate while answering in a way that provides a clear chain of reasoning that can be verified.

Speed is essential to user experience. A new estimator comparing a four-hour manual training to a twenty-minute AI-assisted one will choose the faster path almost every time, regardless of what’s happening underneath. However, speed without transparency trains estimators to trust outputs they can’t explain, which will lead to further problems down the line. 

The key to longevity is striking a balance; easy enough that a new estimator prefers using it, while preserving the source material and reasoning of legacy platforms. Every output should be traceable the same way a veteran would explain a number to an apprentice standing next to them. The goal should be to teach new estimators skills that are repeatable and train their instincts to identify how professionals arrive at conclusions.

That distinction is what separates a tool that can be widely adopted from one that erodes years of deep trade knowledge. An answer with no source teaches a new estimator nothing they can use again. An answer with a verifiable source teaches the underlying skill every time it is used. Software that can close the knowledge gap adequately prepares new estimators with the skills needed to do the job on their own if the software fails.

A Narrowing Window and Shortening Runway

Contractors, along with the CPAs, attorneys and suppliers who support them, are watching two trends collide at once: a construction labor market suddenly attractive to younger workers and a veteran workforce retiring faster than firms can replace it.

The industry should not see this as a crisis but as a window of opportunity for new talent to interact with veteran estimators before they age out of hands-on work. The data center boom has become an unexpected recruiter for the construction industry, handing the industry a new army of young talent with genuine interest in the work. What happens next is crucial to keeping workers around and keeping alive the legacy these firms have built.

It is critical that firms understand in order to maintain quality employees they need to pivot to strategies other than traditional training alone. For estimating departments specifically, that means the value of AI is not primarily about speed, though faster takeoffs and bids are a real byproduct. The true value is in capturing what departing professionals know before that knowledge leaves with them and putting it into the hands of the estimators arriving right now to take their place.

Ben Coffman is the Senior Vice President of Engineering and Product at STACK Construction Technologies.

Location: Los Angeles, California, United States

The post Closing Construction’s Widening Workforce Experience Gap With AI first appeared on Construction Executive.

“Keith Sonderling is uniquely qualified to serve as secretary of labor, with the experience, credentials and proven record of leadership needed to head the department,” said Kristen Swearingen, ABC vice president of government affairs. “As deputy secretary, Sonderling has advanced policies that strengthen the American workforce, expand workforce development opportunities and address harmful Biden-era regulations that restrict worker freedom. His leadership has helped restore a regulatory environment that empowers workers and job creators.”

Earlier this month, the ABC-led Coalition for a Democratic Workplace sent a letter signed by 53 employer organizations urging the Senate HELP Committee to quickly advance Keith Sonderling’s nomination.

ABC encourages the full Senate to swiftly confirm Sonderling so he can continue advancing policies that promote economic growth, protect worker choice and ensure employers have the tools they need to recruit, train and retain the next generation of skilled craft professionals.

SEE ALSO: ARBITRATION NATION: OPPOSING THE FLCA

The post ABC Urges U.S. Senate to Confirm Sonderling as Labor Secretary first appeared on Construction Executive.